“No
Proof of God” read last Saturday’s lead article in the Chieftain’s Faith &
Religion section. The story detailed a lecture presented at the Unitarian Universalist Church in
East Pueblo.
Victor
Stenger (76) atheist and professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado
presented his argument against the Judeo-Christian-Islamic god and highlighted
the detrimental effect he believes religion has on science and the progress of
humanity.
Much of
his diatribe centered on the questioning of issues most Christians have already
dealt with successfully, such as, “proving God scientifically”, “unanswered
prayers”, “creation or science”, and “the silence of God”.
His most
gleaning false accusations dealt with Christianity’s science. He says they are
incompatible. Any fair-minded observer would agree that science formed its
origin in western culture where Christians predominated. The Bible takes a
positive approach toward creation as the marvelous handiwork of God. The
Eastern cultures deny the importance of this world and science, preferring to
escape into other-worldly more spiritual concerns.
Christians
believe that accurate science and accurate Bible interpretation harmonize. If
God is the source of both, there can be no conflict when rightly understood.
Only poor scientists and poor Bible interpreters find conflict between the two.
“What
science does show is quite humbling in the grand scheme of things”, Stenger
explained. Oddly, similar comments were roundly accepted as last week’s PWBC
Wednesday Evening Bible Study of Ps. 19:1. The exploration of nature’s
mysteries enhances our awareness of God, rather than demanding atheistic
explanations. Stenger ‘s best guess at the worlds origin was a “big bang” or
eternity, a mind-boggling faith that the cosmos had no beginning or designer.
Also, he
describes some Christians who deny global warming by casually accepting that
the world is self-regulating and self-correcting. Meanwhile, he blindly accepts
that the universe automatically fine-tunes itself using “mathematical
equations”.
Regarding
values and morals, Stenger commits his most serious error of logic. He attacks
the Christian concept of heaven and hell as counter productive. That is, he
assumes that believers who anticipate rewards and punishments in the afterlife
get lazy and apathetic about the world’s needs. On the contrary, the atheists
of this world are those who are insensitive and fatalistic regarding humanity,
morals, and charity, whereas Christians, Jews, and other godly people who in
fact champion the cause of human need.
Scripture
says, “the fool has said in his heart there is no God.” (Ps. 14:1)
Unfortunately, such foolishness is still proclaimed as newsworthy in the 21st
century.
Pastor John Tanner
0 comments:
Post a Comment